Stop! Your Lease Extension in Ruthin Could Be FREE

Many leaseholders in Ruthin are unaware that their original lawyer had a duty to warn them about future mortgageability and saleability issues. Before you pay thousands to your freeholder, let us audit your purchase history. You might have a claim that pays for your lease extension in full

If you are facing a significant premium because your lease in Ruthin has dropped toward the 80-year mark, your previous lawyer may be at fault. Our panel of experts specialise in recovering lease extension costs from negligent firms who failed to protect your investment.

Top reasons for Ruthin lease extension


Why you should start your Ruthin lease extension today:

Increase your lease and increase your Ruthin property value

As the length of the unexpired term of a Ruthin domestic lease diminished so does its value and therefore the value of your property. Where the residual term has, more than 100 years remaining then this decrease may be fractional nevertheless there will become a point in time when a lease has less than eighty years unexpired as part of the premium you will incur is what is termed as a marriage value. This could increase sharply the cost. It is the primary rational as to why you should consider extending without delay. Many flat owners in Ruthin will meet the qualifying criteria; however a lawyer can advise whether you are eligible for a lease extension. In certain situations you may not qualify, the most common reason being that you have not been the owner of the property for two years.

Ruthin property with a lease extension has roughly the same value as a freehold

Leasehold properties in Ruthin with in excess of one hundred years remaining on the lease are often referred to as ‘virtual freehold’. This is where the lease value the same as a freehold interest in your home. In such circumstances there is often little upside in purchasing the reversionary interest unless savings on ground rent and estate charges merit it.

Mortgage lenders may not loan monies with a short lease

The trend since over the last decade has been for mortgage companies to tighten lending requirements generally - this has extended to the property over which the home loan is to be granted. This has resulted in the minimum number of years remaining under the lease required by banks has increased. Historically banks would grant a mortgage on a lease with twenty years plus the term of the loan - typically fifty year leases but those requirements are being increasingly undermined by the requirement for longer and longer leases - many now have a minimum term of 75 years as a prerequisite.

Lender Requirement
Accord Mortgages 85 years from the date of completion of the mortgage. Please ensure that you explain the implications of a short term lease to the borrower.
Bank of Scotland Minimum 70 years from the date of the mortgage.
Godiva Mortgages A minimum of 70 years unexpired lease at completion for all scheme types apart from Lifetime Mortgages (Equity Release), which require a minimum unexpired term of 80 years at completion.
TSB Minimum of 70 years at mortgage commencement, with 30 years remaining at mortgage redemption.
Virgin 85 years at the time of completion. If it's less, we require it to be extended on or before completion.

Get in touch with one of our Ruthin lease extension solicitors or enfranchisement solicitors

The conveyancers that we work with handle Ruthin lease extensions and help protect your position. A lease extension can be arranged to be completed to coincide with a change of ownership so the costs of the lease extension are paid for using part of the sale proceeds. You really do need expert legal advice in this difficult and technical area of law. The lawyer we work with provide it.

Ruthin Lease Extension Example Cases:

Jackson, Ruthin, Denbighshire

Last year Jackson, started to get near to the eighty-year mark with the lease on his first floor flat in Ruthin. Having purchased his flat two decades ago, the length of the lease was of little concern. by good luck, he noticed he would imminently be paying an inflated amount for a lease extension. Jackson arranged for a lease extension at the eleventh hour last May. Jackson and the landlord who owned the flat above eventually agreed on the final figure of £5,000 . If he failed to meet the deadline, the price would have become more costly by a minimum £900.

Ruthin case:

Mr and Mrs. U Sharif was assigned a lease of a purpose-built apartment in Ruthin in January 2012. The dilemma was if we could shed any light on how much (approximately) premium would likely be for a ninety year extension to my lease. Comparable premises in Ruthin with 100 year plus lease were valued around £166,800. The mid-range amount of ground rent was £50 billed annually. The lease lapsed in 2076. Given that there were 50 years outstanding we estimated the compensation to the landlord to extend the lease to be within £32,300 and £37,400 plus expenses.

Ruthin case:

Last January we were phoned by Mrs J Brown , who took over the lease of a one bedroom flat in Ruthin in November 2009. We are asked if we could shed any light on how much (roughly) price would likely be for a ninety year extension to my lease. Identical premises in Ruthin with an extended lease were worth £280,000. The mid-range ground rent payable was £45 invoiced quarterly. The lease came to a finish in 2096. Taking into account 70 years outstanding we estimated the compensation to the landlord for the lease extension to be within £12,400 and £14,200 exclusive of professional charges.